Veränderungen im: Book of Case Remedy

Es gibt viele handfeste Veröffentlichungen über Veränderung der Tech seitens dem "neuen Management". So z.B. die folgende vom 3. Oktober 2000 (leider in englisch, vielleicht will einer sie für uns übersetzten) über das Buch "Book of Case Remedies". Ich habe weiteren Alter-is darin gefunden und daraufhin aufgegeben, die 1991er Version zu studieren und habe auf die unverfälschte 1975er Version zurückgegriffen!

love

Andreas

Forum: alt.religion.scientology
Thread: Lurkers: RE: alterations to The Book of Case Remedies
Date:03/10/2000

Author:Virginia McClaughry <vmcc@icehouse.net>

Hi all,

SQUIRRELING IN THE BOOK OF CASE REMEDIES

It has come to my attention that there has been some squirreling of the tech in The Book of Case Remedies.  I am comparing two different versions of this book.  The first version is copyright by L. Ron Hubbard, revised in August of 1975; the second version is copyright 1991 by L. Ron Hubbard Library.

In my squirreled 1991 version, in the Preface it says:

".In this new edition, the chapters found in the original appear as Book One.  The opening chapter has been revised according to notes written by Ron in 1968, including update of its chart of gradients of case advancement per the modern Grade Chart."

In my 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard version it says in the Preface:

".THE BOOK OF CASE REMEDIES becomes, with Ron's H.C.O. Bulletins of 9 November 1967 and 13 January 1968, a new book and a new technical breakthrough.  This expanded edition contains all the material of 1964.  It also releases new technology resulting from upper level discoveries by L. Ron Hubbard."

So, according to the preface in BOTH books, my earlier version (1975 by L. Ron Hubbard) should contain all of the updates and revisions that Ron specified.

The first chapter of both books is entitled "The Tradition of Scientology". On page 10 of my squirreled 1991 version, the heading at the top of the page says "Release Differs from Clear".  On page 12 of my 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard, the same section is entitled "CLEAR DIFFERS FROM O.T."  Just a minor detail you say? Read on.

Here's the squirreled 1991 version:

"Release Differs from Clear

So OT was the state of beingness.

Release was a gradient condition. (A gradual bettering.)  During studies of the past year, all this disentangled and became understood, and for the first time was easy to express.

Release is not a gradient up to OT. Release is a gradient up to Homo novis only.  Homo (man) novis (new).  This is a desirable improvement.  Very desirable for anyone.

An entirely new thing has to be done to make an Operating Thetan.

But one had to know how to make one to find out about one.  And Routine 6, the process that makes Clear, starts, really, at Homo novis.  Certainly Routine 6 runs best on a Homo novis.  The proof is that those Scientologists who have been pretty well released don't have any trouble at all with Routine 6; and those who haven't been released, and particularly those who have had few gains in processing, have a pretty awful time of it with Routine 6.  They get a bit along with it, but it's like watching a pygmy wrestle with an elephant."

Ok, now let's compare the "same" section in my 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard version:

"CLEAR DIFFERS FROM O.T.

So O.T. was the state of beingness.

Clear was a gradient condition. (A gradual bettering.)  During studies of the past year, all this disentangled and became understood, and for the first time was easy to express.

Clear is not a gradient up to O.T. Clear is a gradient up to Homo Novis only.  Homo (man) Novis (new).  This is a desirable
improvement.  Very desirable for anyone.

An entirely new thing has to be done to make an Operating Thetan.

But one had to know how to make one to find out about one.  And Routine 6, the process that makes an O.T., starts, really, at Homo Novis.  Certainly Routine 6 runs best on a Homo Novis.  The proof is that those Scientologists who have been pretty well cleared don't have any trouble at all with Routine 6; and those who haven't been cleared, and particularly those who have had few gains in processing, have a pretty awful time of it with Routine 6. They get a bit along with it, but it's like watching a pygmy wrestle with an elephant.

Thus, although we have Routine 6, my task has
been to bring
preclears up to clear and then send them onward
to O.T."

Hmmm, just a slight alteration there. There's
more, much more.

Just following the above section in the new and
improved squirrel
version is another short section entitled
"Release" which ISN'T in
my 1975 version, and then the section entitled
"The Levels to OT".

Here's the 1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
squirreled version:

"The Levels to OT

This is done - and very doable it is - by moving
the being up to a
few basic wins with ordinary processing (up to
Grade IV) and then
moving the preclear up to Clear and then going
for OT.

To stretch a point, one is really clearing from
ARC Straightwire to
Grade VI; but clearing, now that I've had a
chance to refine it, is
itself a process that takes skill and ability
both to run and
receive.  And one has to get the being up to
doing that.  So a being
who can do that is a "Release," which reaches up
to Grade VI."


All right, now let's take a look at my 1975 by
L. Ron Hubbard
version:

"THE LEVELS TO O.T.

This is done - and very do-able it is - by
moving the being up to a
few basic wins with ordinary processing (up to
Level III) and then
moving the preclear up to clear (Level IV) and
then going for O.T.
which is Level VI (V being skipped, but left in
place because it
contains a known type of technology, not needed,
but necessary to
know the existence of).

To stretch a point, one is really clearing from
Level I to Level IV;
but clearing, now that I've had a chance to
refine it, is itself a
process that takes skill and ability both to run
and receive.  And
one has to get the being up to doing that.  So a
being who can do
that is a "Release," which reaches up to Level
II."


Besides the rather gross and obvious changes,
I've also noticed some
very subtle alterations as well.  For example,
Ron always referred
to the state of Operating Thetan as "O.T."
(notice the period after
each letter), whereas C.S.T. dba L. Ron Hubbard
Library always uses
just "OT", without the periods.  Ron says
"clear" (without caps),
RTC/CST say "Clear" (capitalized).  Ron says
"Homo Novis" (novis
capitalized), RTC/CST say "Homo novis" (novis is
not capitalized,
and the entire phrase is ALWAYS italicized).
Look at the last
sentence of the squirreled "The Levels to OT"
above, and look at
where it says "Release,"  No, that's not my
typo, the com ma and end
quote have actually switched places from the
original version.

Let's be VERY GENEROUS here (but certainly not
REASONABLE), and
let's just say that all these alterations are
NOT intentional, and
that someone just made some INNOCENT mistakes
here.  Gee, I wonder
what Ron would have to say about that?

"In the presence of suppression, mistakes occur.
That is another
factor in suppression and an indicator of
someone who is a potential
trouble source - they will make mistakes.
People making mistakes or
doing stupid things is evidence that a
suppressive person exists in
that vicinity.

All illness, in greater or lesser degree, and
all foul-ups stem
directly and only from a PTS condition."

Gee, it looks like Ron was pretty specific about
this point - he
didn't leave too much wiggle room did he Robert?
Just a minor
detail here, but. "It is a high crime to permit
suppressive and PTS
people in Publications Orgs or departments or in
Department 16
(Division 6, advertising) as these will starve
both the public and
the org."


Well, maybe the above listed outpoints are the
only ones in the
book.  Maybe the rest of the book is pure,
on-source LRH tech, let's
see...

Well. on page 28 of my squirreled version under
the heading of "The
Main Point",  the last part of the sentence
says:
".to be successful in releasing, clearing or
making OTs."

In my 1975 version it says:
".to be successful in releasing, healing,
clearing or making
O.T.'s."

Just below at the end of the same section, it
says (squirreled
version): "So, to release, clear or make OTs one
has to be an expert
on blows, their cause and cure."

1975 version:
"So, to release, heal, clear or make O.T.'s one
has to be an expert
on blows, their cause and cure."

Oops, the words HEAL and HEALING were taken out.
Were there some
LEGAL ramifications to leaving those words in?
Perhaps that is the
justification for altering LRH's words here.

Ok, let's get into the meat and potatoes of the
book, the actual
remedies themselves. Well, let's just start at
the beginning of the
remedies, which is chapter six, Table of
Remedies.

On page 38 of my 1991 squirreled version, is the
first actual remedy
- Remedy A.  At the bottom of the page is a
small note.  It says:
"*Procedure modified per HCOB 9 Nov. 67,
REVISION OF REMEDY A,
REMEDY B, AND S AND Ds."

On page A-1 of my 1975 is the actual HCOB
itself.  Great!  Now we
can VERIFY whether the 1991 version is accurate
or not.

So let's see, all of Remedy A is perfect, just
exactly the way it is
in my older 1975 version.  Ok, let's look at
Remedy B.  Beautiful!
No changes at all. Ok now let's check S & D -
oh-oh.

In HCOB 9 Nov. 67, REVISION OF REMEDY A, REMEDY
B, AND S AND Ds
(which is contained in my 1975 L. Ron Hubbard
version but not my
1991 squirreled version) it has Remedy A, Remedy
B, and then right
after Remedy B it has S & D - just like the
title of the HCOB.  But
in my 1991 squirreled version, the section on S
& D is completely
missing.  Well, maybe it just wasn't important.
Let's see what it
says:

"S & D

Search and Discovery of Suppression is called an
"S and D."  It
locates the suppressives on the case."

Whoops. how did THIS get left out?  Well, let's
see what else is in
there.

".Therefore I researched further and developed
what we will now use
as an S & D.
It is one of these killer processes.  It is VERY
strong.  So it
isn't to be carelessly done.

.The real question for an S & D was established
only when I found a
purpose all Suppressives have in common and is a
very fundamental
effort in suppressives.  This effort by
suppressives, when found,
then permitted me to form the question.

The key S & D question is:
"Who or what has attempted to unmock you?"

Unmocking (an effort to reduce or make
disappear) is the primary
effort of suppressives."

Wow!  How did THAT get left out? Interestingly
enough, in new tech
volume 8, p 131, this same HCOB carries a
special note
"(Note: To be reprinted for insertion in every
copy of The Book of
Case Remedies)"
Obviously LRH wanted ALL of this data in The
Book of Case Remedies,
so how come not ALL of it made it in the book?

I just noticed that on the very next page of my
1975 L. Ron Hubbard
version is ANOTHER HCOB.  It is HCOB 13 January
1968, S & Ds.  Wow!
Another HCOB dealing with S & Ds, that isn't in
my new and improved
squirrel version. Maybe it contains some more
useful data.  Let's
look, shall we:

"There are three types of S & D (Search and
Discovery).  These are
used to nullify the influence of Suppressive
persons or things on a
case so the person will be able to be processed
and will no longer
be P.T.S. (a Potential Trouble Source).  People
who are P.T.S.
became that way because of suppression by
persons or objects.
Insanity is also remediable by S & Ds where the
person can be
processed.

In the body of the HCOB, Ron describes three
types of S & D, each
with it's own specific question:

S & D TYPE U - "Who or what has attempted to
unmock you?" S & D TYPE
S - "Who or what are you trying to stop?" S & D
TYPE W - "Who or
what are you trying to withdraw from?"

Then near the bottom it says:

".Properly listed the results are magical.  If
they are not magical,
then listing tech is badly out and should be
re-studied from ALL
materials and tapes on the subject."

How did all of these vital pieces of Ron's tech
get left out of a
New & Improved version of The Book of Case
Remedies? One would hope
that these alterations were not intentional,
because if they were,
they would of-course fall into the following
Suppressive Acts:

Using Scientology (or perverted and alter-ised
tech and calling it
Scientology) harmfully so as to bring about
disrepute to an org,
group or Scientology itself.

Issuing alter-ised Scientology technical data or
information or
instructional or admin procedures, calling it
Scientology or calling
it something else to confuse or deceive people
as to the true
source, beliefs and practices of Scientology.

Acts calculated to misuse, invalidate or
alter-is legally or in any
other way the trademarks and service marks of
Dianetics and
Scientology.

Intentional and unauthorized alteration of LRH
technology, policy,
issues or checksheets.

Developing and/or using squirrel processes and
checksheets.

Severe breach of ecclesiastical and/or fiduciary
duty as an
executive or corporate official of any
Scientology or Dianetics
organization which has resulted in severe harm,
loss or disrepute
for Scientology or the organization.

Violation or neglect of any of the ten points of
Keeping Scientology
Working, as listed here:

One: Having the correct technology.

Four: Teaching correctly the correct technology.

Six:  Seeing that the technology is correctly
applied.

Seven: Hammering out of existence incorrect
technology.

Eight: Knocking out incorrect applications.

Nine: Closing the door on any possibility of
incorrect technology.

Ten: Closing the door on incorrect application.

Acting in any way calculated to lose the
technology of Dianetics and
Scientology to use or impede it's use or shorten
it's materials or
it's application.

Withhold of vital information.  Obstruction of
vital technical or
management information lines in such a way as to
deny people tech
data, prevent students and pcs moving up the
Bridge, or obstructing
the relay, disclosure or free distribution of
vital information so
as to prevent it's arriving amongst the public
and orgs in terms of
results.

Suppressive acts are clearly those covert or
overt acts knowingly
calculated to reduce or destroy the influence or
activities of
Scientology or prevent case gains or continued
Scientology success
and activity on the part of a Scientologist.  As
persons or groups
that would do such a thing act out of
self-interest only to the
detriment of all others, they cannot be granted
the rights
ordinarily accorded rational beings.


In closing, I would like to quote one final
thing from my 1991
RTC/CST version of The Book of Case Remedies.

"It is with great pride that we present this new
edition of The Book
of Case Remedies.

The Editors, 1991"

(Notice that the title of the book is now italicized)

Virginia


Änderungsstand: 12. Mai 2001 - Copyright 2001 by Andreas Groß, Schweiz
Bitte Informieren Sie uns über Änderungen oder Fehler