Pilot's gefährliche Chakren-Experimente haben ihn fertiggemacht

Ein Briefwechsel zwischen EL und Andreas Groß über Squirrels, am Beispiel von Ken Ogger, alias The Pilot:

EL schrieb: Also, für mich ist das ein Problem: einerseits möchte ich mit allen, die auf irgendeine Weise an dem spirituellen Fortschritt der Menschheit arbeiten, gemeinsame Sache machen - dafür muß ich darauf verzichten, eine Übereinstimmung in allen Details zu verlangen. Ich muß mich auf die grundlegenden Gemeinsamkeiten besinnen, und versuchen, darüber Verständigung zu erzielen.

Andererseits will ich mir auch das Wesentliche nicht verwässern lassen.

Das ist doch so absurd: da gibt es Millionen und aber - Millionen von Menschen, die glauben, Materie sei das einzige, was zählt, die predigen, der Mensch sei eine Maschine, usw.usf. - und die paar Leute, die verstanden haben, daß das Universum aus Lebendigkeit und Verstehen besteht, die ihr Leben dem Fördern der Lebendigkeit verschrieben haben, streiten sich darüber, ob man nach Prozess x lieber Prozess y oder Prozess z machen sollte, oder ob man beim Postulieren nach dem Ausräumen von Gegenbetrachtungen noch irgendetwas anderes tun muß, um Postulate zu verwirklichen..... ...

EL: Ich finde "Den Fall Ogger" auch persönlich ziemlich erschütternd.

Ein ehemaliges (?) Super Tech-Terminal, hoch studiert, hoch auditiert, hoch trainiert, hoch verdient, der sich für eine Reform der Scientology-church eingesetzt hat, der dann aber aufgrund persönlicher Schwierigkeiten  in solche Verwirrung gerät, daß er nach deren Beseitigung auf einmal Unsinn redet, fixe Ideen vertritt. Wie ist so etwas überhaupt möglich?

Andreas Groß: Dazwischen liegt seine Anwendung von SuperScio

EL: Meine erste Idee nach einem flüchtigen Blick in die case-mails von Ken war: "kein Wunder, daß er Postulate nicht umgesetzt bekommt, wenn er sich so unethische Ziele setzt, wie Mädchen in sein Bett zu bekommen". Nach etwas intensiverem Lesen der mail habe ich dann gesehen, was er alles gemacht hat, um dieses aberrierte Ziel in den Griff zu kriegen. Das war offenbar vornehmlich  subjektives Prozessieren (Ladung von allen 2D-Terminalen der letzten 1000 Jahre runtergeholt). Hat er überhaupt Ethik erwogen?

Und das Suchen nach den "Traps, vor denen Ron gewarnt hat", hat mir dann die Lösung beschert. Danke für den Hinweis.

AG: Die Out-Ethik bzgl. Mädels war als Sexuelle Fixierung schon die Folge seiner out-Tech: Er hat seine Chakren beginnend mit dem untersten nach oben geöffnet. Ich zitiere aus The Pilot's SuperScio 5. The Chakras:

In yoga, there is an advanced practice called Kundalini where you get the energies of each chakra flowing upwards to the ones above it, starting with the first and continuing on to the top of the series. They warn beginners not to try this, because people have turned on pains that lasted for years before they got these things under control. I, of course, figured that the odds were that I was probably just mocking these chakras up anyway, and that even if something was really there I'd be able to handle the energies involved because I had done so many other energy drills.

So I began gently coaxing an energy flow upwards from the first chakra to the second, and having the second contribute to the flow to make an even bigger flow going up to the third, etc.

The first three were easy and pleasant and gave me no problem. When I hit the 4th, there was a bit of resistance but I was able to push through it (a mistake as it turns out). When I hit the 5th, I turned on an array of Heavy somatics. This included toothaches, headaches, chest pains, etc. These all started simultaneously and were quite intense. I was amazed. So I slowly and carefully dampened the flow (not reacting in panic or suppressing the area, because that can make something stick or react compulsively) and this reduced the intensity of the somatics from heavy to mild.

Genau vor diesen Praktiken und dieser Reihenfolge der Chakren warnte LRH z.B. in a lecture given on 10 November 1952: "INTRODUCTION: THE Q LIST AND BEGINNING OF LOGICS":

Let's take the subject of the chakra -- very interesting. There are seven of them. And what do you know! It says right at the beginning there, "Man is a mind who owns a body. He is not a body who owns a mind." It says, "This is the crown chakra. The crown chakra is in the head, it's in the skull. There are seven chakra in all. And now it's the last one which one approaches."

"The crown chakra is the last one which one approaches." Get that. Says that right there. There's the true datum and the false datum. If you took it as the last one to approach, and if you did to the other chakra in the body -- the other zones or centers, which are not really beings but which we call entities -- if you did nothing but process those and you took up the crown chakra last, the crown chakra would not come free with any ease at all.

It would take a terrifically specialized technique. If you started in with the crown chakra and said, "Beat it, bud," he would. But if you address the other, if you address chakra number seven and work backwards up the line toward the crown chakra, you would probably have your preclear in a condition whereby he was so stuck in his body that only super-super-human-being techniques would free him. That's the way you pin him down.

Ich habe von diesem Phänomen schon in meinen "spirituellen Studien" von vor Scientology gehört: Wenn man die Kundalini-Energie entfacht (Chakren von unten nach oben), kann es sein, dass der Sex (2. Chakra) voll entfacht ist, aber der Thetan (8. Chakra) nicht die Power hat, dieses unter Kontrolle zu halten. Das Ergebnis ist eine Person, die von ihrem Schwanz gesteuert wird. Täglich hinter Sex her geiert, ganz egal welche out-Ethik damit einhergehen mag. Unstillbare Lust. Mit dem Spirituellen Weg ist es dann meist vorbei.

Ein weiterer wichtiger Beitrag zum Thema "Andere Praktiken" liefert Ron in seinem Vortrag 19 May 52, OUTLINE OF TECHNIQUE 80 aus der Serie "The Route to Infinity". Dort wird deutlich, dass die Tatsache, dass jemand sich geistiger Dinge und Praktiken bewußt ist, noch lange nicht bedeutet, dass er es auch gut mit einem meint. Und dass dies doch leider sehr verbreitet ist:

In India's sunny clime when I was in my prime, I used to talk to some of these boys. They're good lads. They're all sick, but they're good lads. They are very wise, they are so wise that they know not what they know. They have gotten up to a point of observation, not action, and they sit endlessly and observe - very remarkable.

The number of things which they can do are quite interesting, but they don't compare with the number of things that a human being fully cleared up the line could do. It is nothing! It's just nothing to take a few matches in a bowl of water and make them run this way and that way with poltergeist just by looking at them. It's really nothing to be able to take a television screen, turn it off so that you got the afterglow on the thing and then stop it from glowing at will - whh! whh! whh! Just block it out and then let it turn on again; block it out just by looking at it and so on.

You can control the material universe, but you can control it a lot more than that. And I'm not now talking about mysticism. Mysticism is the hidden, the secret, so forth.

I happen to be talking much more closely in the realm of physics - much more closely.

Now, these chaps in India are doing the exact reverse of Technique 80. And if you want a good, broad description of Technique 80, Technique 80 is best described by being the exact opposite of everything everybody in India is doing in order to become holy and to take off for nirvana. Now, if you just look all that up and find out what all that is and then reverse it all, you've got Technique 80. Because you can't arrive by going out the top; by trying to go out the top you go out the bottom.

Because what are they trying to do? They're trying to say "Oh, the material universe is no good!" They're trying to say "The body is no good." They're trying to say "I won't have anything to do with it. I detest it. I am not going to touch it. I'm going to abstain from everything material. I am not going to kill anything. I won't even kill a cockroach if it runs across my slipper. We are short of meat but we're going to let a dozen cows walk through the temple courtyard." Anything, in short, of these practices is a detestation of life, of living, of the material universe. It's saying, "I don't want any part of it."

And sure enough, you can go up that line and become quite interesting. You can become quite interesting, but you sure don't become Clear! It is the surest, fastest way to get sick that I know of! The Ibis: You learn to stand that way for eight hours. The Something-or-otherness: You cross your legs and let the flanks lie down flat, and eventually you can get to a point where you could lie spraddle like that, and the total achievement when you've finished that is to have your legs able to lie down flat.

You can make a person sit still long enough and he will get the counter-effort of every effort he ever received. That is to say, you make a person just sit still, make him sit real still, make him concentrate on sitting still, and all of a sudden he'll get help! He'll feel one of these old half-suspended counter-efforts suddenly drill him. Maybe it's way back down the track. It's very amusing. Concentrate on sitting still - that's yogi [yoga].

You know what I would do if I really wanted somebody to be completely blind on how you got out of this universe? I'd teach him yoga, if I really wanted to blind him. If I really wanted to wipe out his knowingness and his beingness, I would teach him these techniques with care, with great care; tell him how he had to practice and how careful he had to be.

There is only one way, really, to get into a state of living, and that's live! There is no substitute for an all-out, over-the-ramparts, howling charge against life. That's living. Living does not consist of sitting in a temple in the shadows and getting rheumatism from the cold stones. Living is hot, it's fast, it's often brutal! It has a terrific gamut of emotional reactions.

If you are really willing to live, you first have to be willing to do anything that consists of living. Weird. But it's one of those awfully true things that you wonder why one has to say it. And yet it has to be said. Because people who are trying to become holy, trying to go to nirvana, trying to go to heaven, trying to become the eighth dynamic, trying to become very savvy on the seventh dynamic, trying to be able to do poltergeist and these other phenomena, are backing up from doing all of them by getting stiller and stiller and less and less, until finally they hit zero.

Well, you can say that zero is in nirvana too. But I like to have guys in zero if they're fighting me; they won't fight me if they go down to zero.

How do you vanquish an opponent? You hit him so hard and so fast, so suddenly, that you drive him into apathy quickly. He won't recover; he's close to zero.

How do you not discover a secret of existence? Well, the best way not to discover it is to back up from it and sit still. If you are going up toward infinity, for heaven's sakes, examine infinity. Infinity would consist of everything, wouldn't it, just at first glance and first analysis. And so that would mean sweeping action, it would mean sweeping decision, it would be "to be." But in order to be you have to have willingness to be, and as you go up the line - all angels have two faces: one white, one black - you have to be willing to destroy as well as willing to create. "To be" is everything, and therefore as you go up the line, you have to be willing to risk, to dare.

There is nothing to be gained by backing up from life. That isn't the way out, except through the bottom. If you want to become MEST, back up from life and say "The material is no good. We must now codify our behavior so that we have to take eighteen sacred glances at the whopajug every day, whistle 'Yankee Doodle' backwards six times and go through the sacred ceremonies of turning off TV. And then we will become holy and part of all and godly."

That was the biggest control operation that anybody ever put across in the course of this human race! That's really a wonderful control operation, because it takes any one of you who wants to be, who wants to get into action, who wants to control life, who wants to assume an allness and an intimacy with all of creation, and it says gladly and happily, "Here's the route, fellow. Here it is. Here it is. You sit down with your flanks of your legs flopped out for eight hours a day and you do the Ibis. And you stand up and bow down before this altar sixteen times, and you count your mouth organs or something and say 'Om mani padme om, om mani padme om, om mani padme om,' and you'll get there."

It's a dirty trick! It's as dirty a trick as taking some little kid, and he's walking down the street and he's all happy and cheerful and he wants to go to the movies. He wants to go to the movies. And you know that off on this other street down here they're fumigating - they're fumigating a house - and it's a dirty, narrow alley. And this little kid can't read, and there's a big sign there, says Danger, Stay Out of This Area. So you carefully tell the little kid, very gently - you say, "Well, sonny, I tell you how you go to the movies. You go down this alley and there's a red and white sign down at the end of alley. And you can't read, but that sign really says Movies This Direction. And you go down to the other end of the alley and you stand there for fifteen minutes, and they'll open the door and you'll get in the back of the theater for nothing." And then you smile very happily and sweetly to yourself - little Audrey just laughed and laughed. And you go down a little bit later and stir the body up with your toe and say "Ha! Ha! Ha! What a big joke!"

Well, that is about as big a joke as has been put across on the human race. They tell you to go down that alley through the phosgene gas, and that's the way to live. Well, it isn't. The way to live is to go to the movies - the other route.

Now, here was a crossroads for man. Here was his chance to get up again, to be, to be constructive, to exist in groups, to cooperate with his fellows, to be above the need of law and order, to assume an ethical level which was so natural and so well understood that at no time would anybody need to moderate it - there's a natural ethic - and because somebody wanted a body to control, they turned them down the other street and they said, "Be quiet."

Dies ist die Referenz, die mich letztendlich von anderen Praktiken kuriert hat. Man muß wohl erst den Konfront auf die Boshaftigkeit hereinbekommen, die von solchen "Powervollen Geistern" betrieben wird. Nicht jeder OT möchte andere stark werden lassen. Oder er ist einfach mangels Wissen nicht zu Besserem in der Lage.

Wie verbreitet dieser Fallenmechanismus der indischen u.a. spirituellen Praktiken verbreitet ist, kann man einfach an den fehlenden Produkten dieser Richtungen erkennen.

Auch Bhagwan/Osho hatte diese Verdrehung spiritueller Techniken in das Gegenteil erkannt gehabt und darüber einmal gesprochen. Seine Erklärung dazu war die folgende:  In frühen Zeiten wurde die Tech jeweils mündlich von Generation zu Generation weitergegeben. Irgendwann entstand jedoch die Notwendigkeit, die Tech schriftlich zu fixieren und so weiter zu geben. Doch dabei entstand die Sorge, die Tech könnte von Leuten geraubt werden, die sie nicht haben sollten. Also sind zum Schutz vor Mißbrauch die Texte so umgeschrieben worden, dass sie bei präziser Anwendung ins Gegenteil schlägt. Eine ergänzende mündliche Überlieferung war zu diesen Texten also noch erforderlich, diese umfasste, welche Textstellen wörtlich zu nehmen sind und welche ins Gegenteil zu kehren waren.

Aus heutiger Sicht halte ich Bhagwans Interpretation für eine Rechtfertigung eines krassen Outpoints: Dass Black-Tech verbreitet wird. Denn es ist nicht zu übersehen, dass es unseren Gegnern gelungen ist, jeden Ansatz auf spirituelle Freiheit zu übernehmen und von innen umzudrehen.

Black-Spiritualität scheint eine 100 % Verbreitung gefunden zu haben. Mittlerweile ist es unseren Gegenspielern sogar gelungen, die Scn-Church in die Reihe der Black-Praktiker einzureihen. Aber auch das hatte LRH ja vorhergesehen, wie man im PDC-Tape 20 nachlesen kann (siehe meine Website, dort gibt es deutschsprachige Übersetzungen zu dieser Stelle).

Wir sollten daher die einmalige Gelegenheit nutzen, dass ein großes Wesen auf der Erde eine Tech hinterlassen hat, die uns frei machen kann. Wir sollten diese Tech studieren und anwenden, solange wir noch die Möglichkeit dazu haben und sollten jeden Versuch (sei es aus Dummheit, aus Eigenwichtigkeit oder aus Bosheit), diese Tech zu verwässern, zu vermischen und zu verdrehen zurückweisen, als das was es ist: Squirreln. Und das ist etwas schlechtes.

Andreas


Änderungsstand: 18. Juli 2001 - Copyright © 2001 by Andreas Groß, Schweiz
Bitte Informieren Sie uns über Änderungen oder Fehler