Since when did the falsification of LRH-Tech really start?
Most scientologists outside the Church are aware, that the doctrine and the materials of the Church are now thoroughly falsified. Obvious examples are re-issues of HCOBs and HCOPLs - which per HCO PL 24. Sept. 1970RA may only be written by L. Ron Hubbard years after the announcement of Rons death. I have documented some bold falsifications on my website under the following links: Squirrel-Altert
Obvious became also the objective of these falsifications. Besides a long row of alterations, the purpose of which only was, to let the public get used to "improvements", there are some, by which it becomes clear who the new ruler of Scientology is, as documented in the following essays:
Some alterations are meant to protect the new ruler and to make sure, that his opponents in the Church can be thrown out of the game, all the way to a SP-declare and that the good old members dont dare, to listen to these people, and therefore break connection:
Finally there are the most essential alterations in the Tech, which are to mess up and destroy Rons legacy to mankind:
To many this is nothing new. But new is the following ascertainment: when we have realised, that the Church was taken over by opponents and controls the re-issue lines, and therefore are bold enough to falsify LRH-data (which is is the biggest crime in Scientology). When we realise, that the traveling direction of the Scientology-train no longer goes from "south to north" (Rons symbolism for the downside of the scale and the topside of the scale =north. When one looks at a globe, one can tell the downside=south from the topside=north. Perhaps also a hint at the war of the united southern states=pro-Britisch-slavekeepers against the united northern states =fighters for the independance of the Britisch Crown) but meanwhile has gone from north to south is (because in the meantime many measures of the Church especially of HCO, but also of Tech, bring the staffmembers down), then we must ask ourselves, when this change of course started.
The exact determination, when those malevolent people, started alterations, is important, in order to avoid the two following mistakes.
When one fixes this date to late (for instance on 1986 - Rons alledged date of death), then one will mix false data in Auditortraining , whereby the Auditors can achieve deplorable gaines at most with PCs. According to my observation worden deze fouten door veel ervaren Auditors daardoor afgezwakt, omdat zij vanzelfsprekend valse Tech in hun eigen toepassing buiten beschouwing laten. But as long as the false Tech stays in trainingmaterials, in any case the future generations of Auditors, who maybe justly protest against verbal Tech and hold the available materials for a criterion, with this in it self correct asumption are being led astray. We would probably not like in the Church set course for the south but for the east. But that would be just bad enough!
As a result one undermines the certainty the PCs, Auditors and Case-Supervisors have in the stable workability of the Tech. Because Ron garanties us only then 100% results, when there is no deviation of his Tech.
When one fixes this date to early (for instance many feel, that the Tech is only ok till 1964 ok and that Ron himself began from there, to destroy the workability of the bridge), then one will deny himself essential and valueable improvements of the Tech. Later on the OT-levels were developed, Standard-Dianetics and many other matters It is impossible to depart from that.
I have thus tried, to determine the exact time, when the alteration of the Tech began. This can, in so far, not be done quite precise, because one can find even begin 60ties"resumes of the Tech" in HCOBs, which have clearly not been made by Ron, because they, compaired with the original materials, contain mistakes. Ron complains in the Class-8-lectures, that he had to ascertain, that in the 60ties some of his materials were falsified or even put aside. Therefore one must assume a gradual sfere of influance of the opponents on the re-issue lines of the Scientology materials.
Even since 1950 secret services and psychiatrists have smuggled their agents into Scientology and tried to get them on high influential posts. This way a miljonair named Perceel could take over the management of the Dianetics research foundation in 1951 and Ron lost the rights on the Dianetics book and the tradename Dianetics for years. This was a passing earlier-simular to the powerchange by CST-RTC of today. It shows, how the suppressors operate: they provide themselves with a legal basis, to cease controll of the opponents "shop". Then it failed, because Ron gave up the field of expertise Dianetics shortly after and presented a new field of expertise named Scientology. He could evade the attack. In fact he could in 1955 also add to his justice conto the result of having won back the rights to "Dianetics". This he celebrated with the book "Dianetics 55!", which is nevertheless for its content a pure Scientology-book, when one uses the now customary difference between Dianetics and Scientology.
So there have always been partial successes of the opponents, like for example the Quickiegrade, which could destroy the Scientologychurches in the late 60ties, because Ron due to the loss of his visum had to leaveEngland and by that lost direct controll over the re-issueinglines and over St. Hill. Ron maintained this loss of controll by the building up of the Sea Org, who had to help him, to restore Ethics in the Orgs.
As a stable datum I have therefore assumed, dat het vakgebied zolang vergaand integer gebleven is, as Ron could control communication lines to the Orgs and the individual Scientologists. Because as long as Ron could communicate to the Scientologists and they to him (2-way!), he had a n opportunity, to correct all kinds of attacks on the integrity of Scientology (mainly the materials: HCOBs, HCOPLs, books, courses, orders etc.).
In a "Fairytale" LRH described already in 1952 how his life and lifeswork would run and end. I have cited it here: Der Mann und die Goldene Kugel.
On the moment, that he no longer could be informed by seperate Scientologen about an Alter-Is OR when he could no longer make sure, that his communications (HCOBs, HCOPLs etc.) went out fully and unchanged to the Scientologist, one must assume, that the thorough alterations could and did begin.
Threefold measures.
Ron has by threefold measures made sure, that the authenticity of his communications can be traced:
1. Prohibition on verbal Tech as in hidden dataline. In HCOPL 16. APRIL 1965 DE "HIDDEN DATA LINE" he writes:
"Die gesamte Technologie ist in HCO-Bulletins und HCO-Policybriefen und auf Tonbändern, die ich herausgebe, veröffentlicht. Ich teile Leuten nichts auf irgendeinem privaten Weg mit nicht einmal Überwachern. ...
Es gibt keine "verborgene Datenlinie". Wenn man glaubt, es gäbe eine, schafft dies einen ARC-Bruch.
Der Anschein einer solchen Linie wird nur dadurch hervorgerufen, daß jemand vorgibt, von mir mehr zu wissen, als auf den Tonbändern und in Büchern und in Mimeoausgaben zu finden ist, oder um es brutal auszudrücken, dadurch, daß jemand Materialien abändert. Dies sieht wie eine "verborgene Datenlinie" aus. Es ist aber ganz sicher keine. ...
Nehmen Sie aber um Himmels willen nicht jemandes Alter-is als Beweis für die Existenz einer verborgenen Linie.
In der Scientology sagen wir: "Wenn es nicht geschrieben steht, ist es nicht wahr." Das gilt für Anordnungen. Wenn jemand sagt: "Ron sagte, daß dann werden Sie von einem erfahrenen Mitarbeiter als Erwiderung hören: "Laß es uns schriftlich sehen." Es ist vorgekommen, daß ganz neue Leute in eine Org hereinspazierten und sagten: "Ron hat gesagt, ich soll 25 Stunden Auditing bekommen". Und in den Anfangszeiten von Orgs wurde es ihnen manchmal gegeben. Wir lernten also auf die harte Art - "Wenn es nicht geschrieben ist, wurde es nicht gesagt."
Und das gilt für Jedermanns Anordnungen, nicht nur für meine.
Und für Tech und Policy gilt es ebenso. Wenn es nicht in einem HCOB oder HCO PL steht, oder mit meiner Stimme auf einem Tonband aufgezeichnet wurde, dann ist es nicht Tech oder Policy.
Wenn Sie das nächste Mal eine angebliche Anordnung hören oder einem Squirrel-Prozeß begegnen, der mir zugeschrieben wird, sagen Sie: "Wenn es nicht geschrieben oder aufgezeichnet ist, ist es nicht wahr"."
(Remark: the entire new structure of the commandlines in the Scientologychurch relies exclusively on such a "Hidden Data Line": because even now there are no HCOPLs as such not even falsified in which Ron supposedly has presented this bevelsgerechtigde upperhalf of the Int-Management: there is no Watch-Dog-Committee, no Commodore-Messengers-Org, no RTC, no CST. Those are all inventions of the new rulers, which are not based on any LRH-issue.)
2. He has made all important technical data available in lectures: one can here on them Ron"s voice, as he informed us about his researchresults. Even when since the 90ties attempts of the RTC exist, to falsify these lectures, to errase complete passages or also just a few words (example. LINK PDC20), there are still enough older tapes on the market, who now are all being made available in digitalised form (WAV- or MP3-files), so that every body can obtain certainty about the authenticiteit of the technical fundamentals.
3. The HCOBs, HCOPLs a.o. schriftelijke re-issues are all based on originals, which L. Ron Hubbard either wrote by hand or on his typewriter signed by him. The publicationorgs could at least show reproductions of these originals, so that they could prove their publications in this way. When these originals of a HCOB, HCOPL can no longer be presented, then they dont exist, then they probably are forgeries!
In fixing the date I leave the individual testimonies out of consideration, because these testimonies cannot be verified anymore and could for many reasons have been false: be it misleading testimonies of hostile agents, who deliberatly want to occlude the date in demand, be it testimonies of people, who want to cover up their doings with a little lie. Also the so called testimony of Mary-Sue Hubbard, she was last seen in 1978, can only be a rumour, because one can not speak with MSH since about that time!
The LRH-Lectures
With them we also found an important datum, to determine the wanted, precise date: what is the last lecture, where we can hear Ron's voice and put it to the test? Because Ron has given lectures since 1950 frequently, to inform us scientologists about his latest researchresults. The last LRH-lecture, that can be bought is the following: on 13. Nov. 72 Ron gave the lecture "Diseases - Breakthrough" in the light of the Expanded Dianetics research. In the same year he gave 16 lectures (4 for the Expanded Dianetics and 12 ESTO-lectures).
Through this Link kommst Du zu einer Tabelle, in which I wrote extensively down the number of lectures per year and added comments.
In 1975 he supposedly gave22 lectures for a few chosen auditors on the New Vitality RD, which can only be studied in Flag. To me its not known, if this cours is still being delivered and if on it, the lectures can still be heared.
At least since that year there is only every so many years a socalled Ron's Journal, in which Ron speaks to the Scientologists. In them are so many outpoints though, that one must assume, that these lectures have been falsified. Also the meddling in "What is Scientology?", issue 1992 are striking, the number of taperecordings mentioned on the list in these years was therefor set higher because, musical compositions (alledgedly composed by L. Ron Hubbard) and older LRH-texts recited by others, were produced on cassette.
By liberal calculation, at most the lectures till end 1976 are authentic and indicate a communicationline with Ron. Cutting time sharp one can only take 1972 as date, because only these tapes can be bought by students, be listened to and could be checked for authenticity.
Wellnow, this is just a possible establishment, which gives a certain oriëntation, but does not allow clear satisfactoty proof. Whereby one already asks oneself, why L. Ron Hubbard since 1973 would not have given public lectures anymore, which he loved so much and which also as a verifiable commline der Standardtech has been so important!?
Die kommentierte Liste seiner Bücher über die Jahre shows, that the "Introduction to the E-Meter" from 1966 is the last book published by himself. All later books are compositions of older materials by staffmembers. In het gunstigste geval heeft Ron tot heruitgave van deze latere boeken aangespoord of ook goedgekeurd, but he did not write anything new for that. So this also does not bring us any closer, but now...
Conclusions
My conclusions from these data are, that L. Ron Hubbard lost definitive controll of his commlines in, at last, 1977. For that it plays in this analysis no role, whether he was already dead at that time or that he was imprisoned or that he was zu krank war, to care or that he was in hiding vor dem staatlichen Zugriff bis zum Lebensende versteckt, what the new management wants us to believe. Ther e has been much speculation about that and these speculations dont bring us any further. In december he was supposedly working on the Tech-Filmshoots (Pro-TRs-Film), but none of the actors or technicians got to see him there, he gave his "directions per Dispatch". I hold this for unreal and for a swindle. It was said that only the married copple Pat & Annie Broeker and "personal physician" Dr. Denk had acces to LRH. His alledged death in jan. 1986 was very staged and we were left with many open questions, as hier ausführlich beschrieben wurde.
What takes us really further though instead of all these exciting speculations, is the analysis that Ron at least since 1977 no longer had influence on the further developement of the Tech and the guidelines. Because all changes could evidently take place without his permission or the possibility of correction since his death, one must assume, that this had already started since beginning 1978. Because the Broekers claimed to have been the exclusive commline between Hubbard and the church from 1977 till 1986. Untill a year after Ron's death they were believed in the Church. But after that: even gemäß der Einschätzung von David Miscavige waren die Broeker jedoch korrupt.
And per KSW this means that, that all these changes can not be considered to be standard Tech. The issues and revisions starting 1977 can be , to my opinion, be divided into two categories:
First well intended uitwerkingen by technical co-workers, who wanted to consolidate the tech, make it then easier for new students, to get trained to be an Auditor. These issues have the authority of a BTB, therefore they are definitely valuable, as long as they dont contradict LRH-issues. These issues have been promoted by the new management, to make it look like L. Ron Hubbard is still writing and also, to conceal in there the issues of the second category. To those I reckon most NED-issues, FPRD, Prepchecking.
Secondly there are malevolent squirles of the Tech, which want to keep us from the Bridge to total freedom. To those I reckon the prohibition of Dianetics with Clears, the putting aside of Power, Power Plus, R6EW and Clearing Cours, de bewering, that NED makes real Clears now, the DCSI/CCRD, the turning around of the Bridge sequence of Dianetics and Grades, the cancelation of the real OT-levels 4 to 7, the four falsified versions of OT 8 and last but not least: de RPF.
One methode of the CoS-Squirrels consists of replacing, functioning LRH-Tech by "newer HCOBs" with opposite explanations. Hierover heeft Ron zich wel eens uitvoerig uitgesproken en vastgelegd, that newer Tech does not cancel older Tech. Because of this widespread false data, I have quoted here large parts of thisHCOBs 30. Juni 1970
As a conclusion I call upon all Scientologists, to verify these presented data and to make their own estimate, as to how long Ron could controll his commlines, to then return to the functioning Tech, as Ron left us that until 1977. We should dig up the old checksheets of courses and restore these courses to there former glory and do a False Data Checking on all that false data, which was introduced since then by the new rulers in the Church. Dit is een omvangrijke maar lonende opgave: because we will be rewarded with a Tech, that gives 100% results.
So we win a Tech, with which again real Clears and OTs can be made.
Andreas Groß
Änderungsstand: 22. Januar 2004 -
Copyright © 2004 by Andreas Groß
Bitte Informieren Sie uns über Änderungen
oder Fehler